<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.8.0 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Sat, 07 Nov 2009 21:22:22 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/"><rss:title>Orr's Observations</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/</rss:link><rss:description>Joel Orr's thoughts about current tech news</rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2009-11-07T21:22:22Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.8.0 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/4/happiness-hat-encourages-smiles-by-giving-you-pain-when-your.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/13/fast-company-dyson-re-invents-the-fan.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/7/brain-to-brain-communication-demonstrated-at-university-of-s.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/6/new-scientist-3d-blocks-on-microsoft-surface.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/2/siliconvalleycom-the-2009-ig-nobels-honor-gas-mask-bra-bar-b.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/29/brigham-young-university-study-on-5-skills-of-most-creative.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/26/farhad-manjoo-in-slate-google-and-microsoft-should-steal-the.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/25/honda-shows-an-amazing-personal-mobility-device.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/23/gizmodo-microsofts-secret-tablet.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/21/techcrunch-in-washpost-vcs-arrogating-credit.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/4/happiness-hat-encourages-smiles-by-giving-you-pain-when-your.html"><rss:title>Happiness Hat "encourages" smiles by giving you pain when you're not smiling</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/11/4/happiness-hat-encourages-smiles-by-giving-you-pain-when-your.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-11-04T23:40:13Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="youtube-video"><object width="400" height="300"><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true"> </param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"> </param><param name="movie" value="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7283341&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1"> </param><embed src="http://vimeo.com/moogaloop.swf?clip_id=7283341&amp;server=vimeo.com&amp;show_title=1&amp;show_byline=1&amp;show_portrait=0&amp;color=&amp;fullscreen=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" width="400" height="300"> </embed>  </object></div><p><a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://vimeo.com/7283341">happiness hat</a> from <a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://vimeo.com/lmccart">Lauren McCarthy</a> on <a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://vimeo.com">Vimeo</a>.</p><br /><br /><div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=b87ff4a7-a611-85e8-848d-038d5af3e8d8" /></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/13/fast-company-dyson-re-invents-the-fan.html"><rss:title>Fast Company: Dyson re-invents the fan</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/13/fast-company-dyson-re-invents-the-fan.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-10-13T21:07:38Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h2 id="hdr_article-headline">    The Dyson Air Multiplier Doesn't Suck, It Blows  </h2>      <cite><span class="by">BY</span> <a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://www.fastcompany.com/user/noah-robischon" title="View user profile.">Noah Robischon</a></cite><span class="timestamp">1 hour, 22 minutes ago</span>        <div id="article-top-wrapper">            <br class="clear" />  </div>      <!--paging_filter--><p>Sir James Dyson has made a mint selling the story of his dogged pursuit of the vacuum cleaner that "never loses suction." But Dyson's newest product doesn't suck. It blows.</p> <p>That's right, Dyson's newest invention is a room fan--a <em>bladeless</em> fan--called the Air Multiplier. And it turns out that the Air Mulitiplier might never have been invented at all, if Dyson's engineers didn't notice something strange was happening during testing of another product, the Airblade hand dryer. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.fastcompany.com/blog/noah-robischon/editors-desk/dyson-air-multiplier-doesnt-suck-it-blows?partner=homepage_newsletter"><i><b>More</b></i></a><br /></p><br /><br /><div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=248d9dda-df86-8048-a339-59f62a164a43" /></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/7/brain-to-brain-communication-demonstrated-at-university-of-s.html"><rss:title>Brain-to-brain communication demonstrated at University of Southampton</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/7/brain-to-brain-communication-demonstrated-at-university-of-s.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-10-07T18:42:18Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="youtube-video"><object height="344" width="425"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/93p7oDkA5WA&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1"> </param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> </param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"> </param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/93p7oDkA5WA&amp;color1=0xb1b1b1&amp;color2=0xcfcfcf&amp;hl=en&amp;feature=player_embedded&amp;fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowscriptaccess="always" height="344" width="425"> </embed> <br /><b>More</b></i></a></object></div>
<p><br /><a href="http://www.soton.ac.uk/mediacentre/news/2009/oct/09_135.shtml">
<div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=037ca102-8ad0-8582-baad-4aee531361ce" alt="" /></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/6/new-scientist-3d-blocks-on-microsoft-surface.html"><rss:title>New Scientist: 3D blocks on Microsoft Surface</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/6/new-scientist-3d-blocks-on-microsoft-surface.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-10-06T20:11:30Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<object id="flashObj" width="486" height="412" classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=9,0,47,0"><param name="movie" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/2227271001?isVid=1&publisherID=981571807" /><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=43606504001&playerID=2227271001&domain=embed&" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><embed src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/2227271001?isVid=1&publisherID=981571807" bgcolor="#FFFFFF" flashVars="videoId=43606504001&playerID=2227271001&domain=embed&" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" name="flashObj" width="486" height="412" seamlesstabbing="false" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowFullScreen="true" swLiveConnect="true" allowScriptAccess="always" pluginspage="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></embed></object><a target="_blank" href="http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17919-smart-lego-blocks-take-touch-screens-into-3d.html?DCMP=OTC-rss&amp;nsref=online-news"><i><b>More</b></i></a><br /><br /><div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=dab9db4f-bc5a-840e-88fe-605a77ff3594" /></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/2/siliconvalleycom-the-2009-ig-nobels-honor-gas-mask-bra-bar-b.html"><rss:title>SiliconValley.com: The 2009 Ig Nobels honor gas-mask bra, bar brawl research and more</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/10/2/siliconvalleycom-the-2009-ig-nobels-honor-gas-mask-bra-bar-b.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-10-02T21:30:33Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="postmetadata">Posted by <a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/author/jmurrell/" title="Posts by John Murrell">John Murrell</a> on October 2nd, 2009 at 6:54 am&nbsp;<a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://blogs.siliconvalley.com/gmsv/tag/science" rel="tag"></a> 				</p>  				  				  					<p>Oh sure, “Ardi,” the newly revealed skeleton of the <a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/news/ci_13461419">oldest known member of the human family tree</a>, is the science story getting all the big headlines today, but let us not ignore <a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2009/oct/02/ig-noble-awards-britons-top">the diverse and compelling projects</a> that were <a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/8285380.stm">honored Thursday night</a> with this year’s Ig Nobel prizes, given with good humor for research that “cannot, or should not, be repeated.” Among this year’s <a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://improbable.com/ig/winners/#ig2009">winners</a>:</p> <p>* Elena N. Bodnar, Raphael C. Lee, and Sandra Marijan of Chicago, who won the public health prize for inventing a bra that in a pinch can be used as a pair of gas masks.</p> <p>* Stephan Bolliger, Steffen Ross, Lars Oesterhelweg, Michael Thali and Beat Kneubuehl of the University of Bern, Switzerland, given the peace prize for their experiments to determine whether it is better to be cracked over the head with a full beer bottle or an empty one. “Empty beer bottles are sturdier than full ones,” they concluded. “However, both full and empty bottles are theoretically capable of fracturing the human neurocranium.”</p> <p>* Donald L. Unger, of Thousand Oaks, Calif., recipient of the prize in medicine for his personal quest to test his mother’s warning that cracking his knuckles would give him arthritis. Every day for 60 years, Unger cracked the knuckles of his left hand at least twice and those of his right not at all. Now 83, Unger said, “After 60 years, I looked at my knuckles and there’s not the slightest sign of arthritis. I looked up to the heavens and said: ‘Mother, you were wrong, you were wrong, you were wrong.’”</p> <p>* Catherine Douglas and Peter Rowlinson of Newcastle University, Newcastle-Upon-Tyne, U.K., who picked up the veterinary medicine prize for showing that cows who have names give more milk than cows that are nameless.</p> <p>* Katherine K. Whitcome of the University of Cincinnati, Daniel E. Lieberman of Harvard and Liza J. Shapiro of the University of Texas, given the physics prize for analytically determining why pregnant women do not tip over.</p> <p>Those <a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://www.siliconvalley.com/news/ci_13468748">other Nobels</a> start going out next week.</p><br /><br /><div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=84c4e398-30c1-8dfa-9acb-58244f7e82ad" /></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/29/brigham-young-university-study-on-5-skills-of-most-creative.html"><rss:title>Brigham Young University study on 5 skills of most creative executives (SiliconValley.com)</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/29/brigham-young-university-study-on-5-skills-of-most-creative.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-09-29T21:41:02Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA["The first skill is what we call 'associating.' It's a cognitive skill that allows creative people to make connections across seemingly unrelated questions, problems, or ideas. The second skill is questioning — an ability to ask 'what if,' 'why,' and 'why not' questions that challenge the status quo and open up the bigger picture. The third is the ability to closely observe details, particularly the details of people's behavior. Another skill is the ability to experiment — the people we studied are always trying on new experiences and exploring new worlds. And finally, they are really good at networking with smart people who have little in common with them, but from whom they can learn." <br /><br />— Brigham Young University professor Jeff Dyer, summarizing findings of a six-year study, lists the five skills that distinguish the most creative executives. (Bonus food for thought from The Economist: "<a target="_blank" href="http://www.moreintelligentlife.com/content/edward-carr/last-days-polymath">The Last Days of the Polymath</a>.") <br /><br /><i>From <a target="_blank" href="http://www.SiliconValley.com">SiliconValley.com</a></i><br /><br /><div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=5b515555-92ca-87c7-aab2-ef11e1c782fd" /></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/26/farhad-manjoo-in-slate-google-and-microsoft-should-steal-the.html"><rss:title>Farhad Manjoo in Slate: Google and Microsoft should steal the idea</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/26/farhad-manjoo-in-slate-google-and-microsoft-should-steal-the.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-09-26T01:28:58Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<i>What idea? An innovation contest, like what Netflix did. Of course there are already "markets" out there that do this--most notably, <a target="_blank" href="http://www.innocentive.com">Innocentive.com</a>. Nonetheless, a good idea.</i><br /><br />It's no surprise that Netflix has launched another contest to improve its<br />movie-recommendations system—the $1 million the company gave away for the<br />first Netflix Prize was the steal of the century. On Monday, three years<br />after the contest kicked off, Netflix awarded the jackpot to BellKor's<br />Pragmatic Chaos, a team of seven engineers, mathematicians, and computer<br />scientists who managed to improve the DVD-rental service's recommendations<br />by 10 percent. BellKor beat out another team—the Ensemble, with more than 30<br />members—that had achieved the exact same ratings improvement but lost by<br />turning in its method 20 minutes after BellKor.<br /><br />Imagine if Netflix had paid all these math whizzes the prevailing wage—say,<br />$100,000 a year. The company would have had to shell out more than $3<br />million for just one year of the top performers' time, and that's assuming<br />it could've sussed out who the top performers were going to be. Of course,<br />many of the programmers worked far longer than a year, some of them setting<br />aside their primary occupations in order to work on the Netflix problem<br />full-time. As Netflix CEO Reed Hastings admitted to the New York Times, "You<br />look at the cumulative hours and you're getting Ph.D.s for a dollar an<br />hour."<br /><br />But even that number discounts the contest's true benefits to Netflix. Had<br />the company simply put out a help-wanted ad for software engineers, it<br />probably wouldn't have been able to recruit many of the geniuses it found<br />through the competition. That's because most of them already have other<br />jobs. BellKor's members work for, among others, AT&amp;T and Yahoo, and many<br />members of the Ensemble are employed by the data-consulting firm Opera<br />Solutions. The participants also spanned the globe. Netflix got submissions<br />from people in more than 100 countries, and the winning team's members<br />worked in New Jersey, Montreal, Israel, and Austria.<br /><br />The Netflix Prize isn't entirely novel. Science prizes date back to at least<br />the 18th century, when the British government offered ₤20,000 to the first<br />person to come up with a way to determine a ship's longitude. Other notable<br />innovation-prize winners include Charles Lindbergh, who won the Orteig Prize<br />in 1927 for flying across the Atlantic, and SpaceShipOne, which won the 2004<br />Ansari X Prize, a contest to launch a privately funded manned craft into<br />space.<br /><br />But the Netflix effort was unusual for a couple of reasons. First, it was<br />funded explicitly for the benefit of a private company; though many<br />participants were interested in finding better ways to predict fickle human<br />tastes, Netflix was looking for research that would help boost its bottom<br />line. The company has already folded some of what it learned from the<br />contest into its recommendations system, and that has helped increase its<br />customer-retention rate. The Netflix prize is also notable for what it was<br />after—not a feat of derring-do, like Lindbergh's, or one of engineering,<br />like SpaceShipOne, but rather a kind of mathematical recipe. Netflix was<br />looking for an idea—and it turns out that Internet-enabled collaboration is<br />particularly well-suited to fostering such abstractions.<br /><br />Indeed, the Netflix Prize should serve as a model for other tech companies<br />working on hard problems, as it combines the best parts of open-source<br />development with the best parts of proprietary code. Just like an<br />open-source project, the prize was remarkable for its spirit of<br />cooperation—over the life of the contest, competitors frequently became<br />collaborators, joining one another's teams when they realized that they<br />could never win by going it alone. The winning team is actually a mélange of<br />three different teams; they joined up in June, and their winning algorithm<br />combines the best ideas of each group.<br /><br />Open-source projects work similarly, but they can sometimes become unwieldy<br />and unfocused when they grow too large. What's more, the open-source model<br />can put off developers who—not unreasonably—are interested in some kind of<br />reward for their work. The prize model solves those problems. Because<br />there's a reward involved (not just money but also fame), teams have a<br />natural incentive to stay focused on a goal and to closely monitor each<br />participant's progress. The winning team—like several others that<br />participated—worked out a formula to determine each member's share of the<br />prize money. And, of course, the prize model works out much better for a<br />sponsoring company like Netflix. By awarding a prize, the company gets to<br />keep all the fruits of contestants' labors; if it had merely sponsored an<br />open-source project, Netflix would have had to share all the innovations<br />that resulted.<br /><br />The Netflix Prize model will likely work a lot better in the software<br />business than in other industries that depend on intellectual property.<br />That's because programmers are used to collaborating with one another, even<br />when they work for companies that are competitors. Netflix can be considered<br />a rival to AT&amp;T—both are working on ways to bring movies into people's<br />homes—but employees of the phone company apparently had no problem helping<br />out the DVD service. You'd be hard-pressed to find such cross-business<br />collaboration in, say, the pharmaceutical industry, where secrecy prevails.<br /><br />So which tech firms can benefit from setting up prizes? My first candidate<br />is Microsoft. In trying to beat Google's search engine, the company faces a<br />clear hiring disadvantage—the world's best search engineers want to work for<br />the world's most committed search company, and that's not Microsoft. What's<br />more, search engines have proved impervious to open-source development;<br />Wikipedia's founder Jimmy Wales tried to take on Google with his wikilike<br />search project in 2007, but the plan foundered and was eventually shut down,<br />mainly for a lack of interest. How to spark that interest? Money. Microsoft<br />could offer $10 million to the first team that figures out a way to improve<br />its search engine by, say, 10 percent. The difficulty here would be in<br />deciding how to measure the "improvement"; one way of doing so would be to<br />discreetly test contestants' algorithms on a subset of search engine queries<br />and then to analyze whether users respond to the results.<br /><br />Google itself could also do well with a prize. The company is heavily<br />invested in solving one of the world's hardest tech problems—machine<br />translation. A prize would be useful here because translation requires a<br />wide range of expertise—software engineering, linguistics, and a whole lot<br />of math—and a high-profile award could get people from different disciplines<br />to team up. Google could award $1 million for each 10 percent improvement in<br />its algorithm for translating large bodies of text across languages. The<br />improvements would be measured in accuracy—the team that writes code that<br />best translates, say, Proust's oeuvre into English would win big.<br /><br />What else? When you start thinking of problems that could be solved through<br />competition, it's hard to stop. How about a prize for improving face<br />recognition in pictures or videos? Or what about one for improving speech<br />recognition, so that we'll finally get to talk to our computers instead of<br />type? After all, movies are important—but perhaps Netflix has stumbled on to<br />something much more useful than a way to tell whether you'll love Napoleon<br />Dynamite.<br /><br /><br /><br />Farhad Manjoo is Slate's technology columnist and the author of True Enough:<br />Learning To Live in a Post-Fact Society. You can e-mail him at<br />farhad.manjoo@slate.com and follow him on Twitter.<br />Sept. 22, 2009<br />Copyright 2008 Washingtonpost.Newsweek Interactive Co. LLC<br /><a target="_blank" href="http://www.slate.com/id/2229225/">http://www.slate.com/id/2229225/</a><br /><br /><div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=ca79da55-4831-8f26-a5cd-2087b148ecef" /></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/25/honda-shows-an-amazing-personal-mobility-device.html"><rss:title>Honda shows an amazing personal mobility device</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/25/honda-shows-an-amazing-personal-mobility-device.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-09-25T21:31:13Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[Honda's new unicycle:

<div class="youtube-video"><object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/zCSQPnGkt78&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1"> </param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"> </param><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always"> </param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/zCSQPnGkt78&color1=0xb1b1b1&color2=0xcfcfcf&hl=en&feature=player_embedded&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowfullscreen="true" allowScriptAccess="always" width="425" height="344"> </embed></object></div><br /><br /><div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=b4293c1e-3874-8dce-84b7-0203799bc54a" /></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/23/gizmodo-microsofts-secret-tablet.html"><rss:title>Gizmodo: Microsoft's secret tablet</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/23/gizmodo-microsofts-secret-tablet.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-09-23T21:49:22Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<h1><a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://gizmodo.com/5365299/courier-first-details-of-microsofts-secret-tablet" class="top">Courier: First Details of Microsoft's Secret Tablet</a></h1> 				 	   	  		 		<div class="post-byline"> 	 		 							 					By <cite>The Paperboy</cite>, 		   						<a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://gizmodo.com/5365299/courier-first-details-of-microsofts-secret-tablet">7:30 PM</a> on Tue Sep 22 2009, 				 				 		 					 							283,278 views		<span class="editor_controls gawkerwidget gawkerWidget_editorcontrols gwId_2678" style="display: none;"> 						(<span class="for_editors control cn_for_editors" style="display: none;"><a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" class="edit_link control cn_edit_link" href="http://publish.gizmodo.com/ged/5365299" target="_new" title="edit this post">Edit</a>, 				<a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" class="draft_link control cn_draft_link postId_5365299" href="http://gizmodo.com/5365299/courier-first-details-of-microsofts-secret-tablet#" title="Make this post DRAFT">to draft</a>, 						</span><a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" class="slurp_toggle control cn_slurp_toggle" href="http://gizmodo.com/5365299/courier-first-details-of-microsofts-secret-tablet#" title="Syndicate this post to an other site">Slurp</a>) 			<div class="slurp_dialog control cn_slurp_dialog" style="display: none;"> 				<form class="slurp_form control cn_slurp_form" method="GET"> 					<p>Copy this whole post to another site</p> 					<div id="formelements"> 						<div class="right"> 							<div class="right"> 								<button type="submit" class="bttn slurp_bttn slurp_button control cn_slurp_button">Slurp</button> 								<a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" class="slurp_cancel control cn_slurp_cancel" href="http://gizmodo.com/5365299/courier-first-details-of-microsofts-secret-tablet#">cancel</a> 							</div> 							<div class="slurp_indicator control cn_slurp_indicator right" style="display: none;"><img alt="sending request" src="http://cache-foo.gawkerassets.com/gawker/assets/base.v8/img/progressIndicator_roller.gif" style="border: medium none ; margin: 0px; padding-right: 3px;" height="16" width="16" /></div> 						</div> 						<select class="site_select control cn_slurp_select" name="siteId"> 							<option value="-1">select site</option> 							<option label="advertising" value="43">advertising</option> <option label="consumerist" value="31">consumerist</option> <option label="deadspin" value="11">deadspin</option> <option label="defamer" value="1">defamer</option> <option label="fleshbot" value="2">fleshbot</option> <option label="gay fleshbot" value="12119">gay fleshbot</option> <option label="gawker" value="7">gawker</option> <option label="gizmodo" value="4">gizmodo</option> <option label="idolator" value="33">idolator</option> <option label="io9" value="8">io9</option> <option label="jalopnik" value="12">jalopnik</option> <option label="jezebel" value="39">jezebel</option> <option label="kotaku" value="9">kotaku</option> <option label="lifehacker" value="17">lifehacker</option> <option label="valleywag" value="34">valleywag</option> <option label="artists" value="37">artists</option> <option label="gawkershop" value="42">gawkershop</option> <option label="sploid" value="30">sploid</option>  						</select> 						 						<input name="op" value="addsitetag" type="hidden"> 						<input name="postId" value="5365299" type="hidden"> 					</div> 				</form> 			</div> 			 		</span> 	</div> 		<div style="float: right;"> 								<div style="margin: 10px 0pt 0pt -10px; clear: both;"> 			<script type="text/javascript">digg_skin = 'compact';digg_bgcolor = '#F1F8FA';digg_url = 'http://digg.com/microsoft/Courier_First_Details_of_Microsoft_s_Secret_Tablet_Micros';</script><script src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.js" type="text/javascript"></script><iframe src="http://digg.com/tools/diggthis.php?u=http%3A//digg.com/microsoft/Courier_First_Details_of_Microsoft_s_Secret_Tablet_Micros&amp;s=compact&amp;t=Courier%3A%20First%20Details%20of%20Microsoft%27s%20Secret%20Tablet%20-%20Microsoft%20courier%20tablet%20-%20Gizmodo&amp;k=%23F1F8FA" frameborder="0" height="18" width="120" scrolling="no"></iframe> 		</div>  		</div> 		 	   		<!-- google_ad_section_start --> 					<p><a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" rel="lytebox" href="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/gizmodo/2009/09/courier8.jpg"><img src="http://cache.gawker.com/assets/images/4/2009/09/500x_courier8.jpg" class="left image500" width="500" /></a>It feels like the whole world is holding its breath for the Apple tablet. But maybe we've all been dreaming about the wrong device. This is Courier, Microsoft's astonishing take on the tablet. <a target="_blank" href="http://gizmodo.com/5365299/courier-first-details-of-microsofts-secret-tablet"><i><b>More (including video)</b></i></a><br /></p><br /><br /><div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=d51f9ba1-e38e-850b-ae43-ec42d326d5f9" /></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/21/techcrunch-in-washpost-vcs-arrogating-credit.html"><rss:title>TechCrunch in WashPost: VCs arrogating credit</rss:title><rss:link>http://joelorr.squarespace.com/blog/2009/9/21/techcrunch-in-washpost-vcs-arrogating-credit.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator><dc:date>2009-09-21T22:54:27Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding-left: 10px;"> <h1><i><small><small><small><small>Jonathan Raphaelson sent me this. Thanks, Jon!<br /></small></small></small></small></i></h1><h1>What Have VCs Really Done for Innovation?TechCrunch.com <br /></h1><font size="2"> Sunday, September 20, 2009; 9:10 AM </font><p> </p></div>  <span id="aptureStartContent"></span> <p> <i>This is a guest post by Vivek Wadhwa, an entrepreneur turned academic. He is a Visiting Scholar at UC-Berkeley, Senior Research Associate at Harvard Law School and Executive in Residence at Duke University. Follow him on Twitter at @<span class="aptureLink " id="apture_prvw1"><span style="background-position: right -1147px;" class="aptureLinkIcon">&nbsp;</span><a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" class="aptureLink snap_noshots" href="http://twitter.com/vwadhwa">vwadhwa</a></span>.</i> </p>  <p> Back in 1986, when Bill Gates was still making sales calls, he pitched my group at First Boston on why we should bet the farm on Windows. Despite the risk involved, we gave his fledgling startup the deal. This wasn't because of his financial backers (he didn't even drop any names), but because we believed in his vision and nerdiness. In the same way, Google became a huge success long before the deep pocketed VC's arrived to ride Larry and Sergey's coattails. They simply had a great technology and winning strategy. </p>  So I'm miffed by the National Venture Capital Association?s (NVCA) <a bitly="BITLY_PROCESSED" href="http://www.nvca.org/index.php?option=com_docman&amp;task=doc_download&amp;gid=482&amp;Itemid=93" target="">claim</a> that companies like Microsoft and Google would not exist today without the funding and guidance provided during their early stages by venture capitalists. <a target="_blank" href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/09/20/AR2009092001125.html?wpisrc=newsletter"><i><b>more</b></i></a><br /><br /><div class="zemanta-pixie"><img class="zemanta-pixie-img" alt="" src="http://img.zemanta.com/pixy.gif?x-id=a4fc2a6e-dc19-8f83-8b1f-d918723b0f7d" /></div>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>